Aadhaar is the most controversial project of India
as it violates human rights and
civil
liberties in cyberspace. In fact, if you speak against Aadhaar
project at social media platforms like Twitter, your tweets would be
censored with impunity. Since its inception, Aadhaar project is a
heavily
censored subject in India. At the time of writing this post,
Twitter is still censoring dissenting tweets regarding Aadhaar.
Aadhaar has also been clubbed with Digital India
project and that had made the combination the
biggest
digital panopticon of human race. This
digital
panopticon of India must be urgently declared unconstitutional by
Indian Supreme Court. Similarly, Aadhaar project of India must also
be
declared
unconstitutional by Indian Supreme Court. Despite the
clear
directions (PDF) of Supreme Court, both Central and State
Government have made Aadhaar compulsory for various services. This is
not only contempt of court but also a clear violation of
Constitutional provisions and safeguards. For instance, Digital
Locker tied up with Aadhaar is
illegal
and would not serve Digital India.
The Central Government is lying before the Supreme
Court by claiming that
Aadhaar
is not mandatory for government services. The reality is that
Aadhaar has been made compulsory for all government services directly
as well as indirectly. Supreme Court of India has taken a stringent
view against this process of making Aadhaar compulsory. It has
directed that Aadhaar cannot be made compulsory for government
services and any authority violating this direction of Supreme Court
would be taken to task.
Supreme Court on Monday
reiterated
its earlier order that Aadhaar card is not compulsory and added that
officials who insist on them will be taken to task. A Bench of
Justices J. Chelameswar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan clarified that
demands made by officials for Aadhaar card is in clear violation of
the Supreme Court’s interim order of September 23, 2013. In the
2013 order, the apex court had directed that “no person should
suffer for not getting the Aadhaar card, inspite of the fact that
some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory”.
“It is a matter of great public importance. The
issue has serious implication in terms of Constitution.
Notwithstanding the court’s order, there is insistence for Aadhaar.
There is complete apathy on the part of officials,” senior advocate
Gopal Subramaniam, representing one of the petitioners and
Bangalore-resident, Mathew Thomas, submitted.
As an example, he referred to NCT government’s
notification on March 9, 2015, insisting that couples require Aadhaar
cards to get their marriage registered under the Special Marriage
Act. In fact, senior advocate Anil Divan pointed out that the Bombay
High Court Registrar had recently received an official communication
asking him to make Aadhaar mandatory for disbursal of salary to staff
and even judges.
Mr. Subramanium argued that collection of personal
data of residents of India under the Aadhaar scheme is not exactly a
government activity, but outsourced to private contractors. “On the
surface it (Aadhaar) is a simple document of identity, but it has
linkages by means of iris scans and biometric details. God forbid if
identities are exchanged or mistaken. The Executive’s scheme
involves private partners. Who are these private partners?” Mr.
Subramanium submitted.
Submitting how the ordinary man is now prone to the
perils of identity fraud, Mr. Subramanium said the “Sovereign State
also has the duty to protect its citizens, to protect his identity,
his personal information against possible misuse”.
“You better advise the States, if the officials
insist, it would have consequences. We will take them to task. This
is absolutely not right,” Justice Chelameswar observed.